Conocimientos tecnológicos del marco TPACK en la aplicación de contenidos educativos digitales en el aula
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47133/rdap2024-24art9Palabras clave:
TPACK, contenidos educativos digitales, profesores, competencia digital docenteResumen
El desarrollo de la competencia digital docente es esencial en la formación de ciudadanos alfabetizados en la era digital. El TPACK (conocimiento tecnológico pedagógico y de contenido) es un marco de referencia para la integración de tecnología en el aula. Este estudio explica los conocimientos tecnológicos del TPACK de cuatro docentes después participar en un curso NOOC (nano cursos abiertos en línea) sobre creación de contenidos educativos digitales. La investigación cualitativa incluyó observaciones de clase y entrevistas. Las observaciones destacaron los aspectos clave del TPACK en la práctica docente. Las entrevistas revelaron reflexiones sobre el TPACK, el impacto del curso en la práctica docente y las barreras para integrar tecnología en el aula. Los resultados indicaron una influencia positiva del curso, dado que los profesores adaptaron y crearon contenidos educativos digitales para sus áreas de desempeño. Se identificaron aspectos tecno-pedagógicos referentes al uso de este tipo de materiales digitales como la interacción y motivación estudiantil, el apoyo a la explicación y la integración de elementos multimedia para diferentes estilos de aprendizaje.
Descargas
Citas
Aniq, L. N., Drajati, N. A., & Fauziati, E. (2022). Covid-19 outbreak response: Tracing EFL teachers’ beliefs & practices of TPACK in teaching writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46535
Bento, J., Sommer, S., & Rocha, L. (2021). Integração De Tecnologia Na Educação: Proposta De Modelo Para Capacitação Docente Inspirada No Tpack. Educação Em Revista, 37, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698232757
Cabero, J., Roig-Vila, R., & Mengual-Andrés, S. (2017). Conocimientos tecnológicos , pedagógicos y disciplinares de los futuros docentes según el modelo TPACK. RCUB Revistes Científiques de La Universitat de Barcelona, 32, 73–84. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/16981
Casal, L., Barreira, E. M., Mariño, R., & García, B. (2021). Competencia Digital Docente del profesorado de FP de Galicia. Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educación, 61, 165–196.
Chieng, Y. E., & Tan, C. K. (2021). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Malaysian science teachers’ survey and perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(5), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1517
Creswell, J. (2012). EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH. PLANNING, CONDUCTING AND EVALUATING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (4td ed., Issue september 2016). Pearson.
Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2021). Fostering the growth of TPACK among international teachers of developing nations through a cultural exchange program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5964
De Freitas, G., & Spangenberg, E. D. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ levels of technological pedagogical content knowledge and information and communication technology integration barriers. Pythagoras, 40(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4102/PYTHAGORAS.V40I1.431
Dias-Trindade, S., & Ferreira, A. G. (2020). Competências digitais docentes: O DigCompEdu CheckIn como processo de evolução da literacia para a fluência digital. Icono14, 18(2), 162–187. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v18i1.1519
Fernández-Otoya, F., Cabero-Almenara, J., Pérez-Postigo, G., Bravo, J., Alcázar-Holguin, M. A., & Vilca-Rodríguez, M. (2024). Digital and Information Literacy in Basic-Education Teachers: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 14(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020127
Fernández, Á., & Prendes, P. (2021). Evaluación de la competencia digital de un centro de enseñanza secundaria a partir del modelo DigCompOrg. Revista Complutense de Educacion, 32(4), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.70953
Fierro, M., Morales Vásquez, M., Norambuena Díaz, D., Bravo González, B., & Contreras Poblete, P. (2021). Objetivos priorizados del eje de lectura en la región del Maule, Chile: problemáticas y desafíos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 86(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8614295
Flerlage, C., Bernholt, A., & Parchmann, I. (2023). Motivation to use digital educational content - Differences between science and other STEM students in higher education. Chemistry Teacher International, 5(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0035
Flores, F., Chan-Te-Nez, A., & Sánchez, J. (2021). La dimensión tecnológica en el conocimiento profesional docente: reperfilando el conocimiento didáctico del contenido de profesores universitarios. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias En Educación, 20(44), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.21703/0718-5162.v20.n43.2021.004
Gil-García, I. C., Fernández-Guillamón, A., García-Cascales, M. S., & Molina-García, Á. (2023). Virtual campus environments: A comparison between interactive H5P and traditional online activities in master teaching. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22665
Hamzah, F., Abdullah, A. H., & Ma, W. (2024). Advancing Education through Technology Integration, Innovative Pedagogies and Emerging Trends: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 41(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.41.1.4463
Holler, S., Brändle, M., & Zinn, B. (2023). How do South African TVET lecturers rate their digital competencies, and what is their need for training for a digital transformation in the South African TVET sector? Journal of Vocational, Adult and Continuing Education and Training, 6(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.14426/jovacet.v6i1.314
INTEF. (2017). MARCO COMÚN DE COMPETENCIA DIGITAL DOCENTE.
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
López, J. R., Ornelas, M. L., Morales, K. F., & Sandoval, J. O. (2021). A concept approach among three types of literacy: Computer literacy, technological literacy and information literacy. Texto Livre, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.29513
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mohamad Nasri, N., Husnin, H., Mahmud, S. N. D., & Halim, L. (2020). Mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: a snapshot from Malaysia into the coping strategies for pre-service teachers’ education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802582
Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Saudagar, F., Pratama, R., Wahyuni, S., Sadikin, A., & Indrayana, B. (2019). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Indonesian science teachers’ survey and perspective. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.662
Nepembe, V., & Simuja, C. (2023). Instructors’ perspectives of TPACK in a vocational training classroom in Namibia. Journal of Vocational, Adult and Continuing Education and Training, 6(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.14426/jovacet.v6i1.315
Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2024). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: a review. In Journal of Computers in Education (Vol. 11, Issue 1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5
Njiku, J., Mutarutinya, V., & Maniraho, J. F. (2021). Building mathematics teachers’ tpack through collaborative lesson design activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30935/CEDTECH/9686
Ortega, J. M. (2020). El conocimiento tecnológico pedagógico de contenido (TPCK): un análisis a partir de la relación e integración entre el componente tecnológico y conocimiento pedagógico de contenido. Tecné Episteme y Didaxis: TED, 47, 249–265. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num47-11339
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). In Sage Publications (3rd ed.).
Rap, S., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Aviran, E., Shvarts-Serebro, I., Easa, E., Yonai, E., Waldman, R., & Blonder, R. (2020). An Applied Research-Based Approach to Support Chemistry Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3278–3284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00687
Rawat, S., Tiwari, S., Sharma, M., & Singh, N. C. (2024). The Digital Pedagogy Competence Scale (DiPeCoS): development and validation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19018
Sánchez-Rivas, E., Ruiz-Roso Vázquez, C., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2024). Teacher Digital Competence Analysis in Block Programming Applied to Educational Robotics. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010275
Sari, Y. R., Drajati, N. A., So, H.-J., & Sumardi. (2021). Enhancing efl teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (Tpack) competence through reflective practice. Teflin Journal, 32(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v32i1/117-133
Tiba, C., & Condy, J. (2021). Newly qualified teachers’ integration of technology during curriculum delivery. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.297.309
Tomczyk, L. (2021). Declared and Real Level of Digital Skills of Future Teaching Staff. Education Sciences, 11(619), 1–16.
Viñoles-Cosentino, V., Esteve-Mon, F. M., Llopis-Nebot, M. Á., & Adell-Segura, J. (2021). Validación de una plataforma de evaluación formativa de la competencia digital docente en tiempos de Covid-19. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.29102
Walan, S. (2020). Embracing Digital Technology in Science Classrooms—Secondary School Teachers’ Enacted Teaching and Reflections on Practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09828-6
