Open abdomen management results. Our experience.

Authors

  • Rosa Ferreira Acosta Segunda Cátedra de Clínica Quirúrgica. Hospital de Clínicas. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad Nacional de Asunción
  • O Cuenca Torres Segunda Cátedra de Clínica Quirúrgica. Hospital de Clínicas. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad Nacional de Asunción
  • J Gamarra Sosa Segunda Cátedra de Clínica Quirúrgica. Hospital de Clínicas. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad Nacional de Asunción
  • H Segovia Lohse Segunda Cátedra de Clínica Quirúrgica. Hospital de Clínicas. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad Nacional de Asunción
  • A Rodríguez González Segunda Cátedra de Clínica Quirúrgica. Hospital de Clínicas. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad Nacional de Asunción
  • N Martínez Villalba Segunda Cátedra de Clínica Quirúrgica. Hospital de Clínicas. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad Nacional de Asunción.
  • A Espínola Escobar Segunda Cátedra de Clínica Quirúrgica. Hospital de Clínicas. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad Nacional de Asunción

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18004/

Keywords:

Open abdomen, Technique, Abdominal sepsis, Paraguay

Abstract

Introduction: The open abdomen is a technique that, consist in deferring the closure of the abdominal cavity after laparotomy, as an alternative management in cases of abdominal sepsis, whose objectives are to prevent the formation of multiple septic foci and protect the abdominal wall, thereby decreasing the damage that happens by successive closures. Objective: To describe the management of open abdomen contained by the Borráez bag at the Second Chair of Surgical Clinic. Material and methods: An observational, descriptive and longitudinal study in patients that went under surgery and were managed with open abdomen contained by the Borráez bag at the Second Chair of Surgical Clinic, from February 2005 to December 2010. Results: 25 patients underwent this surgical technique of contained-open abdomen, of which 13 patients (52%) were female and 12 patients (48%) were male. The average age was 51 years (20 to 81 years) and the open abdomen indications was, fecal peritonitis in 20 patients, intestinal obstruction in 3 patients, Type III evisceration and abdominal wall fasciitis in one patient. Known Pathologies were seen in 41.17% as Rheumatoid Arthritis, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Diabetes Mellitus and hypertension. The multidisciplinary treatment of open abdomen with the Borráez bag was used throughout the study population, and in 4 of them, concurrently to vacuum aspiration system. The abdominal lavage and bag changing in surgery room were performed every 48 hours. Abdominal lavages were performed 1.8 times in average. Wide spectrum Antibiotics were used as well as enteral nutrition in 8 patients (32%) and parenteral nutrition in 17 (68%). The average length of hospitalization was 48 days (2 to 94 days) and 10 patients (40%) were admitted in the intensive care unit. Five patients (20%) developed intestinal fistulae, and the mortality was 44% (11patients). Conclusion: The contained-open abdomen is an easily reproducible technique of multidisciplinary management with satisfactory results in seriously ill patients of difficult management such as abdominal sepsis.

References

1. Borráez O. Abdomen abierto. Utilización del polivinilo. Rev Colomb Cir 2001;16(1):39-43

2. Borráez O. Abdomen abierto: La herida más desafiante. Rev Colomb Cir 2008;23(4):204-209

3. Borráez O. Manejo del Abdomen Séptico. Utilización del Polivinilo.Trabajo presentado en el

XV Congreso “Avances en Cirugía e Infección”, Bogotá,1989

4. Feliciano DV, Burch JM. Towel clips, silos and heroic forms of wound closure. Advances in

Trauma and Critical Care. St. Lowis. Mosby. Year Book Inc 1991;6:231-50.

5. Borráez O. Conferencia: Experiencia con la Bolsa de Bogotá. En el XIX Congreso

Panamericano de Trauma - IX Congreso Colombiano de Trauma. Centro de Convenciones,

Cartagena, 17 de noviembre de 2006.

6. Barker D, Kaufman H, Smith L, Ciraulo D, Richart C, Burns R. Vacuum pack technique of

temporary abdominal closure: a 7-year experience with 112 patients. J Trauma 2000; 48: 201-

6.

7. Moues CM, Vos MC, Bemd GJ, Stijnen T, Hovius S. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum

assisted closure wound therapy; a prospective randomized trial. Wound Repair Regen 2004;

12: 11-7.

8. Arenas H, Anaya R, Barrera L et col. Abdomen abierto. Estrategias de manejo. En Hernias de

la pared abdominal, tratamiento actual. Mayagoitia JC. Editorial Alfill. México 2009;429-439.

9. De la Fuente-Lira M, Mendoza V, Robledo-Ogazón F et cols.Cierre temporal de la pared

abdominal con polietileno. Cir Ciruj 2002; 70: 157-163.

10. Van Goor H. Interventional management of abdominal sepsis: when and how.

Langenbeck’sArch Surg 2002;387:191-192.

11. Darwin Iñaguazo S, María J. Astudillo A. Abdomen abierto en la sepsis intraabdominal severa.

¿Una indicación beneficiosa? Rev. Chilena de Cirugía. 2009; 61: 294-300.

12. Marshall J. Intra-abdominal infections. Microbes & Infection 2007; 6: 1015-1025.

http://simplelink. library.utoronto.ca.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/url. cfm/ 35064.

13. Price J. Surgical intervention in cases of peritonitis. Proc Philadelphia. County Med Soc

1905;26:92.

14. Hunt JL. Generalized peritonitis. Arch Surg 1982;119:209-17.

15. Artz CP, Bornett Wo, Grogan JB. Further studies concerning the pathogenesis and treatment

of peritonitis. Ann Surg 1962; 155:756-67.

16. Schumer W, Domingo KL, Jones B. Peritoneal lavage in postoperative therapy of late

peritoneal sepsis. Surgery 1964; 55:6.

17. Leiboff AR, Soroff HS. The treatment of generalized peritonitis by closed postoperative

peritoneal lavage. Arch Surg 1987;122

18. Huspedth AS. Radical surgical debridement in the treatment of advanced generalized bacterial

peritonitis. Arch Surg 1975;110:1.233-6

19. Steinberg D. On leaving the peritoneal cavity open in acuted generalized suppurative

peritonitis. Am J Surg 1979; 137:216-20.

20. Teichmann W, Wittmann D, Andreone P. Scheduled reoperations (Etappen lavage) for diffuse

peritonitis. Arch Surg 1986; 121:147-52.

21. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of

severe sepsis in the United States: análisis of incidence, outcome and associated costs of

care. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1303-1310.

22. Rotstein M, Meakins J. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges of intraabdominal Infections.

World J Surg 1990; 14(2):159-66.

23. Tavares – De la Paz L, Andrade- De la Garza P, Goné-Fernández A et col. Abdomen Abierto.

Evolución en su manejo. Cir Ciruj 2008; 76:177-186.

24. San Martín G, Gómez J, Raffa C, Krasnov M, Guardo A, Campana J. Laparostomía en

infecciones intraabdominales agudas. Patología de Urgencia 2001; 9: 4- 10.

25. Jardines A. El abdomen abierto en la sepsis intraabdominal grave. MEDISAN 2000; 4:10-14.

26. Vega F, Millán J, Castillo M, Larrinua G, Zamudio I, Vásquez J. Tratamiento de la sepsis

abdominal postraumática con técnica de abdomen abierto. Trauma 2001; 4: 103-109.

27. Expósito M, Aragón F, Curbelo R, Pérez J, López M. Manejo de las peritonitis graves. Nuestra

experiencia con abdomen abierto (1994-1998) y con relaparotomías programadas (1999-

2000). Cir Ciruj 2002; 70: 31-35.

28. Torres Neto J, Pinheiro A, Lisboa A, Mario dos Santos A, Rocha R. Uso da peritoneostomia

na sepse abdominal. Rev Bras Colo-Proctol 2007; 27: 278-283.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-05

How to Cite

Open abdomen management results. Our experience. (2026). Anales of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, 45(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.18004/