Quality and use of information to improve the national response to HIV / AIDS

Authors

  • Edgar Giménez Caballero Investigación para el Desarrollo (ID). Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Concepción. Concepción, Paraguay
  • Gloria Aguilar Programa Nacional de control de VIH sida ITS. Dirección General de Investigación. Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú. Paraguay
  • Tania Samudio Programa Nacional de control de VIH sida ITS. Paraguay.
  • Laura Flores Investigación para el Desarrollo (ID). Paraguay

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18004/anales/2018.051(02)55-068

Keywords:

Routine health information system, PRISM, OBAT, HIV, Paraguay

Abstract

The purpose of any routine health information system is the adequate and timely use of the information it produces to improve the health of the population. Its performance depends on processes determined by technical, organizational and behavioral factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the routine HIV AIDS information system in the public health system of Paraguay. To this end, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out during 2016, applying a standard evaluation questionnaire according to the PRISM model. 154 health sector workers from 76 public health establishments in 4 health regions were included, through sampling based on batch quality assurance. The results indicated that the use of the information was 25.8% and that the quality of the data was 75.6%. The processes of collection, presentation, feedback and analysis of the data presented low performance. Among the determinants, low performance was identified in the following factors: a) the level of knowledge of the forms and the ability to solve problems; b) use of software; and c) data management. The promotion of the information culture was 75.8%. In conclusion, it is demonstrated that quality does not guarantee the use of information, that it is not linked to decision-making and that in order to revert low performance it is necessary to develop capacities and influence the identified determinants.

References

1. WHO. Health in 2015: from MDGs, Millennium Development Goals to SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. ISBN 978 92 4 156511 0 . Ginebra, 2015.

2. PRONASIDA. Situación epidemiológica del VIH en Paraguay 2016. Informe técnico. Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social. Paraguay. 2016.

3. Resolución 70/11 de la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas, Transformar nuestro mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. Véase http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/L.1&Lang=S

4. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 (GBD 2016) Health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Indicators 1990-2030. Seattle, United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) University of Washington, 2017.

5. OMS. Estrategia mundial del sector de la salud contra el VIH 2016–2021. Hacia el fin del sida. Ginebra 2016

6. World Health Organization. Everyone’s business: Strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s Framework for Action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007

7. Red de la Métrica en Salud, Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2008). Marco de referencia y estándares para los sistemas nacionales de información sanitaria. Suiza: Ediciones de la OMS. [Consultado 4 de noviembre de 2017]. Disponible en: http://gestionensalud.medicina.unmsm.edu.pe/?tool=diagnostica-informacion.

8. Aqil A, Lippeveld T, Hozumi D. PRISM framework: a paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems. Health Policy and Planning. 2009;24:217–228. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp010. [Consultado 4 de noviembre de 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2670976/

9. Aqil A, Lippeveld T, Moussa T, Alimou B. Guia del usuario de las herramientas del PRISM. Measure/JSI. 2009

10. Torres N. Aplicación de las Herramientas PRISM. Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social. Paraguay; 2006. 51-p [Consultado 4 de noviembre de 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.mspbs.gov.py/digies/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/2007_OBAT-FINAL-4-DE-JUNIO.pdf

11. Giménez E; Aguilar G. Promoción de la cultura de la información en el Sistema Público de Salud del Paraguay. Evaluación PRISM OBAT. v. Salud Pública Paraguay. 2017; Vol. 7 N° 2; Julio - Diciembre 2017

12. Giménez E; Aguilar G; Peralta N. Evaluación del sistema de información de salud del IPS 2012. Análisis de factores organizacionales y de comportamiento. Informe Técnico. Instituto Desarrollo. Paraguay 2012. Disponible en: http://desarrollo.org.py/admin/app/webroot/pdf/publications/12-10-2015-11-30-29-4415102.pdf

13. OPAS. Renovação da Atenção Primária em Saúde nas Américas: documento de posicionamento da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde/Organização Mundial da Saúde (OPAS/OMS). Washington, D.C: OPAS; 2007.

14. OPS. Redes Integradas de Servicios de Salud: Conceptos, Opciones de Política y Hoja de Ruta para su Implementación en las Américas” Washington, D.C.: OPS, © 2010

15. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2008: Primary Health Care (now more than ever). [documento na Internet]. [acessado 2011 fev 25]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/whr/2008/en/ index.html

Downloads

Published

2026-10-21

How to Cite

Quality and use of information to improve the national response to HIV / AIDS. (2026). Anales of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, 51(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.18004/anales/2018.051(02)55-068