Frequency and profile of the electronic cigarettes use in students of a Public University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18004/anales/2020.053.02.73Keywords:
electronic cigarettes, frequency, risks, ParaguayAbstract
Introduction: The consumption of Electronic Cigarettes (EC) has increased considerably in recent years. These products are now the most commonly used by youth in various countries of the world and our country is not exempt from their use. In this context, the present study has been carried out; whose objective was to know the frequency of use of electronic cigarettes and other characteristics of CE consumption in university students. Materials and methods: Observational, descriptive study. Data from 1500 students from different UNA Academic Units that responded to the electronic survey were processed. Demographic variables such as sex and age, peculiarities on EC related to the preference for a certain device, motivations for consumption, simultaneity of consumption of common cigarettes, as well as the perception of risk with respect to it and the discomfort caused by vaping were determined. The survey was anonymous and carried out between the months of June and July of the year 2019 through the free platform Google Forms. The Excel spreadsheet was used for data processing. The students received a link via instant messaging application to answer the questionnaire, it was distributed by groups of teachers and delegates of the courses of each academic unit. Results: A total of 1500 students answered the survey, 502 men (33.5%) and 998 women (66.5%). The average age was 24 years (SD: ±16), with ages between 17 and 62 years. When asked about the habit of smoking or vaping, the students answered: 1222 (81%) do not smoke, use electronic cigarettes: 74 (5%), 146 (10%) use a regular cigarette and a total of 58 (4%) use both products. Considering the total of EC consumers and those who use both (EC and Common Cigarette), we have a frequency of 132 EC consumers (9%). Perception of risk with respect to common cigarettes: No risk 32 (24%), small risk: 54 (41%), moderate risk: 34 (26%), high risk: 9 (7%) and equal risk: 3 (2 %). Among the most frequent complaints: cough 27 (20%), throat irritation 20 (15%), headache 6 (5%) and general discomfort 4 (3%). Conclusion: The use of EC is close to the consumption of common cigarettes and the university students are not aware of the potential damage that the use of these devices confers. To prevent and reduce the use of electronic cigarettes by youth and young adults, we must implement effective prevention strategies.
References
1. Llambí Laura, Rodríguez Diego, Parodi Carolina, Soto Enrique. Cigarrillo electrónico y otros sistemas electrónicos de liberación de nicotina: revisión de evidencias sobre un tema controversial. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2020 Mar [citado 2020 Jun 17] ; 36(1):153-191.Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S168803902020000100153&lng=es. Epub 01-Mar-2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.29193/rmu.36.1.7.
2. Hrywna M, Bover Manderski MT, Delnevo CD. Prevalence of Electronic Cigarette Use Among Adolescents in New Jersey and Association with Social Factors. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2): e1920961. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20961
3. Walker N, Parag V, Verbiest M, Laking G, Laugesen M, Bullen C. Nicotine patches used in combination with e-cigarettes (with and without nicotine) for smoking cessation: a pragmatic, randomised trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jan;8(1):54-64. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30269-3. Epub 2019 Sep 9. PMID: 31515173.
4. Blount BC, Karwowski MP, Shields PG, Morel-Espinosa M, Valentin-Blasini L, Gardner M, Braselton M, Brosius CR, Caron KT, Chambers D, Corstvet J, Cowan E, De Jesús VR, Espinosa P, Fernandez C, Holder C, Kuklenyik Z, Kusovschi JD, Newman C, Reis GB, Rees J, Reese C, Silva L, Seyler T, Song MA, Sosnoff C, Spitzer CR, Tevis D, Wang L, Watson C, Wewers MD, Xia B, Heitkemper DT, Ghinai I, Layden J, Briss P, King BA, Delaney LJ, Jones CM, Baldwin GT, Patel A, Meaney-Delman D, Rose D, Krishnasamy V, Barr JR, Thomas J, Pirkle JL; Lung Injury Response Laboratory Working Group. Vitamin E Acetate in Bronchoalveolar-Lavage Fluid Associated with EVALI. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):697-705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916433. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PMID: 31860793; PMCID: PMC7032996.
5. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on the Review of the Health Effects of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. Eaton DL, Kwan LY, Stratton K, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2018 Jan 23. PMID: 29894118.
6. King BA, Jones CM, Baldwin GT, Briss PA. The EVALI and Youth Vaping Epidemics - Implications for Public Health. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):689-691. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1916171. Epub 2020 Jan 17. PMID: 31951683; PMCID: PMC7122126.
7. Gómez L, Rolon L, Gutiérrez E, Ayala S, Ibáñez E, Coronel R, Fusillo J. Percepción y uso del cigarrillo electrónico en 1,168 estudiantes de hasta 18 años provenientes de colegios del Paraguay. Neumol Cir Torax, Vol. 78, No. 1, enero-marzo 2019.
8. Czoli CD, Fong GT, Mays D, Hammond D. ¿Cómo perciben los consumidores las diferencias de riesgo entre los productos de nicotina? Una revisión de las percepciones de riesgo relativo del tabaco sin humo, los cigarrillos electrónicos, la terapia de reemplazo de nicotina y los cigarrillos combustibles. Tob Control. 2017; 26 (e1): e49-e58. doi: 10.1136 / cigarettecontrol-2016-053060.
9. Brose LS, Brown J, Hitchman SC, McNeill A. Percibió el daño relativo de los cigarrillos electrónicos con el tiempo y el impacto en el uso posterior: una encuesta con seguimientos de 1 año y 2 años. El alcohol de drogas depende. 2015; 157: 106-111. doi: 10.1016 / j.drugalcdep.2015.10.014.
10. Huang J, Feng B, Weaver S, Pechacek T, Slovic P, Eriksen M. Changing Perceptions of Harm of e-Cigarette Use Among Adults in 2 US National Surveys, 2012-2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3): e191047. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1047.
11. Berg C, Haardoerfer R, Escoffery C, Zheng P, Kegler M. Cigarette Users’ Interest in Using or Switching to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems for Smokeless Tobacco for Harm Reduction, Cessation, or Novelty: A Cross-Sectional Survey of US Adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Feb;17(2):245-55. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu103. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
12. Layden el all. Pulmonary Illness Related to E-Cigarette Use in Illinois and Wisconsin — Final Report. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:903-916. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911614.
13. FDA. Summary of Results: Laboratory Analysis of Electronic Cigarettes Conducted by FDA. Disponible en: http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/publichealthfocus/ucm173146.htm.
14. Córdoba R. El desafío de los cigarrillos electrónicos. Atención Primaria. 2014;46(6):307-312.
