Distancia intercanina e intermolar en dentición mixta y permanente
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18004/mem.iics/1812-9528/2022.020.02.59Keywords:
ortodoncia, dentición mixta, arcada dental, anomalíasAbstract
Introduction: Transverse growth space problems in both maxillaries can be predicted by knowing the intercanine and intermolar width distance. Objective: To determine values of transverse measures of arches in patients with mixed dentition and permanent dentition of the postgraduate degree in Orthodontics of the Latin American Institute of Higher Studies. Methodology: Descriptive observational cross-sectional study, the intercanine horizontal linear distances were taken in temporary and permanent ones, as the intermolar distance in permanent first molars as well in patient study models of the Latin American Institute of Higher Studies in the years between 2014 to 2019. Results:
Participated 144 patients aged from 8 to 32 years old. Where 41.67% were over 15 years old. The 65.28% were women. 52.78% had permanent dentition. The mean maxillary intercanine distance was 33.22 ± 3.95 in men and 33.34 ± 3.90 in women, the mandibular 27.30 ± 2.81 and 27.40 ± 2.92 respectively. The maxillary intermolar distance was 34.16 ± 3.27 in men and 34.15 ± 3.26 in women; the mandibular 33.97 ± 3.27 and 33.94 ± 3.27 respectively. Conclusion: The averages of the intercanine distance, are similar by age and sex, while averages of the lower jaw are minor than those of the upper jaw in both genders. Averages of the intermolar distance to be similar by age, sex, and arch.
Downloads
References
Budiman JA. Mathematical ratio in defining arch form. Dental Hypotheses. 2017; 8(3): 70-3. doi: 10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_26_17
Sangwan S, Chawla HS, Goyal A, Gauba K, Mohanty U. Progressive changes in arch width from primary to early mixed dentition period: A longitudinal study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2011; 29(1): 6 pages. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.79915
Rodríguez ABD, Lince Vides F, Santos Hayssa C, Porto MS, Márquez JE. Estandarización de medidas transversales en modelos de maxilares con normoclusión de un centro educativo de Cartagena. Revista Colombiana de Investigación en Odontología. 2010; 1(2): 254-61. doi: 10.25063/21457735.8
Kareem FA, Rauf AM, Noori AJ, Ali Mahmood TM. Prediction of the Dental Arch Perimeter in a Kurdish Sample in Sulaimani City Based on Other Linear Dental Arch Measurements as a Malocclusion Preventive Measure. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2020; 2020.: 8869996.
Caraballo Y, Regnault Y, Sotillo L, Quirós O, Farías M, Mata M, et al. Análisis transversal de los modelos: ancho intermolar e intercanino en pacientes de 5 a 10 años de edad del Diplomado de Ortodoncia Interceptiva UGMA 2007. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odontopediatría. 2009; (5).
Bishara S. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1997; 111(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80022-4
Alkadhi OH, Almahfouz SF, Tokhtah HA, Binhuwaishel LA. Dental Arch Dimensions in Saudi Adults. International Journal of Dentistry. 2018;2018: 10 pages. doi: 10.1155/2018/2190250
Celebi AA, Keklik H, Tan E, Ucar FI, Celebi AA, Keklik H, et al. Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2016; 21(2): 51-8. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.051-058.oar
Fekonja A. Comparison of mesiodistal crown dimension and arch width in subjects with and without hypodontia. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry: Official Publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry. 2013; 25(3): 203-10. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12026
Oliva B, Sferra S, Greco AL, Valente F, Grippaudo C. Three-dimensional analysis of dental arch forms in Italian population. Progress in Orthodontics. 2018; 19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0233-1
Rojas-Sánchez MP, González-Colmenares G, Cevallos MF, Ortiz LA, Parra DC. Arch parameters and dental discrepancy (crowding and spacing) in a sample of an Afro-Colombian population. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2019; 32: 9.
Daou R, Nassar R, Khoury E, Ghoubril J. Changes of arch form at the end of orthodontic treatment, based on the Ricketts pentamorphic arch forms. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2020; 158(6):807-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.023
Vargas J, Harnisch A, Torres A, Fierro C, Pérez A. Evaluación de anchos intercaninos e intermolares en escolares con dentición mixta, Comuna de Contulmo, Chile. Journal of Oral Research. 2013; 2(2):64-7. doi: 10.17126/joralres.2013.014
McNamara JA, Brudon WL. Tratamiento Ortodóncico y Ortopédico en la Dentición Mixta. Michigan: Needham Press;1995
Bedoya-Rodríguez A, Montoya-Gómez J, González-Benavidez V, Tamayo-Cardona JA, Martínez-Cajas CH. Forma y tamaño del arco dental en poblaciones de tres ascendencias étnicas colombianas. CES odontol. 2016; 29(2): 20-32. doi: 10.21615/3467
