Internación compulsiva de usuarios de crack para el tratamiento de la dependencia: una revisión sistemática de la literatura
Palabras clave:
cocaína crack, conducta adictiva, toxicología forense, derechos humanos, política de salud, control social, salud públicaResumen
El estudio tuvo como objetivo discutir los conflictos de la internación compulsiva de consumidores de crack. Se realizó una revisión sistemática sobre el tratamiento compulsivo. La búsqueda fue realizada en las bases de datos: Scopus, PubMed, SciELO, Web of Science, Elsevier y Medline, así como en Google y Google Scholar, y se incluyeron publicaciones de 2000 a 2017. El desenlace primario de interés fue el uso de drogas post-tratamiento, y el secundario la reincidencia criminal pos-tratamiento. De un total de 448 estudios potenciales identificados, doce estudios cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Se concluye que la internación compulsiva, además de ser agresiva y una forma de tratamiento ineficaz, constituye un modo de eliminación de los indeseados, constituyéndose en práctica higienista violadora de derechos humanos.
Descargas
Citas
Dualibi LB, Ribeiro M, Laranjeira R. Profile of cocaine and crack users in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública 2008;24(4):545-57.
Santos Cruz M, Andrade T, Bastos FI, Leal E, Bertoni N, Villar LM, et al. Key drug use, health and socio-economic characteristics of young crack users in two Brazilian cities. Int J Drug Policy 2013;24(5):432-38.
Hatsukami DK, Fischman MW. Crack cocaine and cocaine hydrochloride. Are the differences myth or reality? JAMA 1996; 276:1580-88.
Dunn J, Laranjeira R, Silveira DX, Formigoni MLOS, Ferri CP. Crack cocaine: an increase in use among patients attending clinics in São Paulo: 1990-1993. Subst Use Misuse 1996;31:519-27.
Veras AB. Fatores determinantes da dependência de Crack na tríplice fronteira – Brasil, Bolívia e Paraguai. Interações 2016;17(1):126-133.
Nappo SA, Sanchez ZM, Ribeiro LA. Is there a Crack epidemic among students in Brazil?: comments on media and public health issues. Cad Saúde Pública 2012; 28(9):1643-49.
Peixoto C, Prado CHO, Rodrigues CP, Cheda JND, Mota LBT, Veras AB. Impact of clinical and socio-demographic profiles in treatment adherence of patients attending a day hospital for alcohol and drug abuse. J Bras Psiquiatr 2010; 59(4):317-21.
Brasil. Lei nº 10.216. Dispõe sobre a proteção e os direitos das pessoas portadoras de transtornos mentais e redireciona o modelo assistencial em saúde mental. Brasília: Diário Oficial Eletrônico; 2001.
Diniz ITPC, Oliveira MHB. Internação compulsória e crack: um desserviço à saúde pública. Saúde em debate 2014; 38(101): 359-67.
United Nations Office on drugs and crime. World Drug Report 2016. Vienna, Austria: United Nations; 2016.
Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S; Bolliger I, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015; 386(9995):743-800.
Dallari DA. Direitos humanos e cidadania. 2. ed. reform. São Paulo: Moderna; 2011.
Pêcego AJFS, Neto ZG. Crack: internação compulsória e cidadania. Revista da AJURIS 2013; 40(130):73-88.
Israelsson M, Gerdner A. Compulsory commitment to care of substance misusers: International trends during 25 years. European Addiction Res 2011; 18(6):302-21.
WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific. Assessment of compulsory treatment of people who use drugs in Cambodia, China, Malaysia and Viet Nam: Application of selected human rights principles. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
Wild CT, Cunningham AJ, Ryan RM. Social pressure, coercion, and client engagement at treatment entry: a self-determination theory perspective. Addictive Behaviors 2006; 31:1858-72.
Bright DA, Martire KA. Does Coerced Treatment of substance‐using offenders lead to improvements in substance use and recidivism? A Review of the Treatment Efficacy Literature. Australian Psychol 2012; 48(1):69-81.
Amarante P, Oliveira MHB, Torre E, Diniz ITPC. Derechos Humanos y Salud Mental en Brasil: una historia de lucha y militancia por la justicia social y el derecho a la vida - la salud no se vende, la locura no se encierra. Rev Átopos (Salud Mental, Comunidad y Cultura) 2016; 2:1-16.
Hall W, Babor T, Edwards G, Laranjeira R, Marsden J, Miller P, et al. Compulsory detention, forced detoxification and enforced labour are not ethically acceptable or effective ways to treat addiction. Addiction 2012; 107(11), 1891-93.
Csete J, Pearshouse R. Detention and punishment. In the name of drug treatment. New York: Open Society Foundations; 2016.
Wild CT, Roberts AB, Cooper EL. Compulsory substance abuse treatment: An overview of recent findings and issues. European Addiction Res 2002; 8:84-93.
Stevens A, Berto D, Heckmann W, Kerschl V, Oeuvray K, van Ooyen S, et al. Quasi-compulsory treatment of drug dependent offenders: An international literature review. Substance Use & Misuse 2005; 40(3):269-83.
Robles G. Cambios y tendencias en el consumo de sustancias psicoactivas como factor de riesgo hacia la exclusión social. Zerbitzuan 2009; 45:123-34.
Uceda-Maza FX, Navarro-Perez JJ, Perez-Cosin JV. Adolescentes y drogas: su relación con la delincuencia. Revista de Estudios Sociales 2016; 58:63-75.
Arenari B, Dutra R. A construção social da condição de pessoa: premissas para romper o círculo vicioso de exclusão e uso problemático do Crack. In: Souza J. (Org.). Brasília: Secretaria Nacional de Política sobre Drogas, Ministério da Justiça e Cidadania; 2016.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7): e1000097.
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7(10):1-7.
Downs S, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52(6):377-384.
Toledo L, Cano I, Bastos L, Bertonid N, Bastos FI. Criminal justice involvement of Crack cocaine users in the city of Rio de Janeiro and Greater Metropolitan Area: Implications for public health and the public security agenda. Int Journal of Drug Policy 2017; 49(2017):65-72.
Heather N. Is the concept of compulsion useful in the explanation or description of addictive behaviour and experience? Addictive Behaviors Reports 2017; 6 (2017):15-38.
Cruz M, Bertoni N, Bastos FI, Burnett C, Gooch J, Fisher B. Comparing key characteristics of young adult Crack users in and out-of-treatment in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Subst Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2014; 9:2.
Hiller ML, Knight K, Simpson DD. Recidivism following mandated residential substance abuse treatment for felony probationers. The Prison Journal 2006; 86(2):230-241.
Strauss S, Falkin G. The first week after drug treatment: The influence of treatment on drug use among women offenders. Am J Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2001; 27(2):241-264.
Sun B, Ye Y, Qin L. An analysis of relapse factors of 615 heroin addicts. Chinese J Drug Dependence 2001; 10(3):214-216.
Kelly J, Finney J, Moos R. Substance use disorder patients who are mandated to treatment: Characteristics, treatment process, and 1-and 5-year outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treatment 2005; 28(3):213-223.
Fairbairn N, Hayashi K, Ti L, Kaplan K, Suwannawong P, Wood E, et al. Compulsory drug detention and injection drug use cessation and relapse in Bangkok, Thailand. Drug and Alcohol Rev 2015; 34(1):74-81.
Jansson I, Hesse M, Fridell M. Influence of personality disorder features on social functioning in substance-abusing women five years after compulsive residential treatment. Eur Addiction Res 2009; 15(1):25-31.
Vaughn M, Deng F, Lee LJ. Evaluating a prison-based drug treatment program in Taiwan. J Drug Issues 2003; 33(2):357-83.
Huang K, Zhang L, Liu J. Drug problems in contemporary China: A profile of Chinese drug users in a metropolitan area. Int J Drug Policy 2011; 22(2):128-32.
Rengifo AF, Stemen D. The impact of drug treatment on recidivism: Do mandatory programs make a difference? Evidence from Kansas’s Senate Bill 123. Crime & Delinquency 2010; 59(6):930-50.
