Therapeutic options in patients with post-diabetes mellitus transplant

Authors

Juan Daniel Acosta González Instituto de Previsión Social, Servicio de Nefrología del Hospital Central. Asunción, Paraguay https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4702-0477
Lourdes Carolina Vázquez Jiménez Instituto de Previsión Social, Servicio de Nefrología del Hospital Central. Asunción, Paraguay https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-552X
Tomás Rodríguez Yánez Universidad de Cartagena, Facultad de Medicina. Cartagena, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9251-9376
Rodrigo Daza Arnedo Asociación Colombiana de Nefrología e HTA Nefrólogo, Comité de Riñón, diabetes y metabolismo. Bogotá, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6295-4972
Stephanie Ospina Lopera Universidad Remington, Facultad de Medicina. Medellín, Colombia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2031-9058
Jorge Rico Fontalvo Universidad Simón Bolívar. Barranquilla, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-1241

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18004/anales/2024.057.02.82

Keywords:

Diabetes Mellitus, transplant, immunosuppression, hyperglycemia, post-transplant diabetes

Abstract

Post transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent complication after organ transplantation. There are several predisposing factors for this complication, which may be present in the pre-transplant, peri-transplant, or already post-transplant; within these, associated immunosuppressive therapies will be highlighted. The clinical importance of DMPT lies in its impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this article, we review traditional interventions and new therapies for managing and treating PTDM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

PDF (Español (España))

Published

2024-09-20

How to Cite

Acosta González, J. D., Vázquez Jiménez, L. C., Rodríguez Yánez, T., Daza Arnedo, R., Ospina Lopera, S., & Rico Fontalvo, J. (2024). Therapeutic options in patients with post-diabetes mellitus transplant. Anales of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, 57(2), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.18004/anales/2024.057.02.82