Addressing predatory publishing: impacts and challenges
Enfrentando las publicaciones depredadoras: impactos y desafíos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18004/Palabras clave:
academic publishing, peer review, artificial intelligence, predatory journals, ethicsResumen
El alto índice de crecimiento de las publicaciones académicas ha ido acompañado del auge de revistas depredadoras y conferencias engañosas, que amenazan la integridad de la investigación al anteponer los beneficios económicos a la rigurosa revisión por pares y a los estándares editoriales. Nuestro estudio examina las características y las repercusiones de las publicaciones depredadoras, destacando las dificultades para definir e identificar este tipo de revistas debido a sus características similares a las de las revistas legítimas. Explora la influencia de los modelos de acceso abierto y la vulnerabilidad de los investigadores ante las prácticas depredadoras. El análisis aborda características operativas, como la composición del consejo editorial, las discrepancias en la revisión por pares, las tácticas de captación y las métricas engañosas, así como dimensiones tecnológicas, como la explotación de la inteligencia artificial para la generación de manuscritos y las decisiones editoriales automatizadas. Se evalúan críticamente las limitaciones de las listas negras y blancas, junto con las soluciones emergentes que implican la tecnología blockchain y las herramientas de detección basadas en la inteligencia artificial. Este trabajo presenta una visión general crítica que pretende informar en lugar de estigmatizar, integrando perspectivas y evidencias actuales.
Referencias
Abdoul, H., Perrey, C., Amiel, P., Tubach, F., Gottot, S., Durand-Zaleski, I. & Alberti, C. (2012). Peer review of grant applications: Criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices. PLoS ONE, 7(9) e46054: 15 pp. <https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0046054>.
Akça, S. & Akbulut, M. (2021). Are predatory journals contaminating science? An analysis on the Cabells’ Predatory Report. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(4)102366: 11 pp. .
Anonymous. (2020). Stop trying to spot predatory journals. Ethical Publishing. [Consulted: 14.xi.2025]. .
Anonymous. (2025). Writing is thinking. Nature Reviews Bioengineering, 3(6)431: 1 p. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-025- 00323-4>.
Bhagat, P.R. (2021). Predatory publications— Recognize and avoid. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 69(12): 3387– 3388. <https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo. ijo_1943_21>.
Björk, B.-C. & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine, 10(73): 10 pp. .
Boulos, L., Rothfus, M., Goudreau, A. & Manley, A. (2022). A descriptive study found low prevalence of presumed predatory publications in a subset of Cochrane reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 152: 316–325. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclinepi.2022.09.004>.
Brandts-Longtin, O., Lalu, M.M., Adie, E.A., Albert, M.A., Almoli, E., Almoli, F., Bryson, G.L., Dony, C., Dunleavy, D., Grudniewicz, A., Lehmann, C., Lhoest, R., Moher, D., Montroy, J., Pitts, M., Ricketts, A., Thirion, P. & Cobey, K.D. (2022). Assessing the impact of predatory journals on policy and guidance documents: A cross-sectional study protocol. BMJ Open, 12(e059445): 5 pp. .
Buitrago Ciro, J. & Hernández Pérez, J. (2024). Pedagogical strategy for scholarly communication literacy and avoiding deceptive publishing practices. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 56(4): 1028–1039. .
Chandra, A. & Dasgupta, S. (2024). Predatory journals: What the researchers and authors should know. The American Journal of 53 Medicine, 137(6): 470–472. .
Choi, I.-H. (2018). Pseudo-journals and pseudo-conferences: The characteristics and preventive measures. Journal of the Korean Neurological Association, 36(4): 289–293. <https://doi.org/10.17340/jkna.2018.4.3>.
Cobey, K.D., Lalu, M.M., Skidmore, B., Ahmadzai, N., Grudniewicz, A. & Moher, D. (2018). What is a predatory journal? A scoping review. F1000Research, 7(1001): 30 pp. <https://doi.org/10.12688/ f1000research.15256.2>.
Cook, F., Govender, R. & Brennan, P.A. (2023). Greetings from your predatory journal! What they are, why they are a problem, how to spot and avoid them. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 61(3): 245–247. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bjoms.2023.02.005>.
Cukier, S., Lalu, M., Bryson, G.L., Cobey, K.D., Grudniewicz, A. & Moher, D. (2020). Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: A modified Delphi consensus process. BMJ Open, 10(e035561): 8 pp. .
Dadkhah, M. & Bianciardi, G. (2016). Ranking predatory journals; Solve the problem instead of removing it! Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 6(1): 1–4. <https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2016.001>.
Fantini, D. (2016). easyPubMed: Search and retrieve scientific publication records from PubMed [Dataset]. Vienna: The R Foundation. <https://doi.org/10.32614/ cran.package.easypubmed>.
De, S. & Mondal, P. (2025). Assessing the impact of misinformation by predatory journals on academic integrity. The Serials Librarian, 77(1–2): 1–12. <https://doi.org/10.1080/0 361526X.2025.2471922>.
Dony, C. (2020). How reliable and useful is Cabell’s blacklist? A data-driven analysis. LIBER Quarterly, 30(1): 38 pp. .
Dony, C. (2025). On (conflating) predatory journals and predatory practices: Presenting the tool ‘Compass to Publish’ and the (im)possible scalability debate. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 48(1): 63–69. .
Eshchanov, B., Abduraimov, K., Ibragimova, M. & Eshchanov, R. (2021). Efficiency of “Publish or Perish” policy— Some considerations based on the Uzbekistan experience. Publications, 9(33): 20 pp. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ publications9030033>.
Fenlon, K., Bonn, M., Green, H., Maden, C.R., Senseney, M.F. & McCullough, A. (2016). Understanding the needs of scholars in a contemporary publishing environment. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1): 1–6. <https://doi.org/10.1002/ pra2.2016.14505301145>.
Forero, D.A., Oermann, M.H., Manca, A., Deriu, F., Mendieta-Zerón, H., Dadkhah, M., Bhad, R., Deshpande, S.N., Wang, W. & Cifuentes, M.P. (2018). Negative effects of “predatory” journals on global health research. Annals of Global Health, 84(4): 584–589. <https://doi.org/10.29024/ aogh.2389>.
Frandsen, T.F. (2019). Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature. Learned Publishing, 32(1): 57–62. .
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295(1): 90-93. <https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.295.1.90>.
Gibney, E. (2025). Scientists hide messages in papers to game AI peer review. Nature, 626: 1–2. <https://doi.org/10.1038/ d41586-025-02172-y>.
Godskesen, T., Eriksson, S., Oermann, M.H. 54 & Gabrielsson, S. (2022). Predatory conferences: A systematic scoping review. BMJ Open, 12(e062425): 10 pp. .
Grames, E.M., Stillman, A.N., Tingley, M.W. & Elphick, C.S. (2019). An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(10): 1645– 1654. <https://doi.org/10.1111/2041- 210x.13268>.
Gray, A. (2024). ChatGPT “contamination”: Estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature. arXiv, 2403.16887: 12 pp. <https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2403.16887>.
Grygoruk, D. (2018). Open Data in Scientific Communication. Folia Forestalia Polonica, 60(3): 192–198. .
Ibrahim, H., Elhag, S.A., Elnour, S.M., Abdel- Razig, S., Harhara, T. & Nair, S.C. (2022). Medical Resident Awareness of Predatory Journal Practices in an International Medical Education System. Medical Education Online, 27(1)2139169: 7 pp. <https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2 139169>.
Jain, V.K., Iyengar, K.P. & Vaishya, R. (2021). Article processing charge may be a barrier to publishing. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 14: 14–16. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcot.2020.10.039>.
Kakamad, F.H., Abdalla, B.A., Abdullah, H.O., Omar, S.S., Mohammed, S.H., Ahmed, S.M., Mohammed, K.K., Hassan, H.A., Baba, H.O., Ahmed, J.O., Mustafa, M.Q., Omar, D.A., Salih, R.Q., Rahim, H.M., Hussein, D.A., Hassan, M.N., Mikael, T.M., Hassan, H.A. & Najar, K.A. (2024). Lists of predatory journals and publishers: A review for future refinement. European Science Editing, 50: 1–9. .
Kendall, G. (2024). Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? Quantitative Science Studies, 5(1): 264–270. .
Kratochvíl, J., Plch, L., Sebera, M. & Koriťáková, E. (2020). Evaluation of untrustworthy journals: Transition from formal criteria to a complex view. Learned Publishing, 33(3): 308–322. <https://doi.org/10.1002/ leap.1299>.
Laine, C. & Winker, M.A. (2017). Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. Biochemia Medica, 27(2): 285–291. .
Lalu, M.M., Albert, M.A. & Cobey, K.D. (2022). Peering into the dark corners of knowledge synthesis to understand the influence of predatory journals on systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 152: 295–297. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclinepi.2022.09.005>.
Masters, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the death of the academic author. Medical Teacher, 47(10): 1563–1565. .
Mastorakis, N.E., Ntalianis, K. & Bulucea, A. (2025). A Blockchain-Based Framework for Indexing Academic Publications and Identifying Predatory Journals. International Journal of Education and Learning Systems, 10: 6–14. .
Mercier, E., Tardif, P.-A., Moore, L., Le Sage, N. & Cameron, P.A. (2018). Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: A 12-month early-career researcher experience. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 94(1108): 104–108. .
Mills, D. & Inouye, K. (2021). Problematizing 55 ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences. Learned Publishing, 34(2): 89–104. <https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1325>.
Moed, H.F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3): 265–277. .
Moussa, S. (2021). Contamination by citations: References to predatory journals in the peer-reviewed marketing literature. South Asian Journal of Marketing, 2(1): 5–27. <https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJM-02-2021- 0021>.
Naddaf, M. (2025). AI linked to explosion of low-quality biomedical research papers. Nature, 641(8065): 1080–1081. .
Oladokun, B.D., Orubebe, E.D., Ogunjimi, B.E., Okeke, O.C., Ottah, G.A. & Ajani, Y.A. (2025). Awareness and Perceptions of Predatory Journals among LIS Scholars in Nigerian Universities: Factors, Rationale, and Challenges in Journal Selection. The Serials Librarian, 86(1–2): 1–16. <https://doi.org/10.1080/036152 6x.2025.2471918>.
Rice, D.B., Skidmore, B. & Cobey, K.D. (2021). Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(175): 4 pp. .
Richtig, G., Richtig, E., Böhm, A., Oing, C., Bozorgmehr, F., Kruger, S., Kiesewetter, B., Zielinski, C. & Berghoff, A.S. (2019). Awareness of predatory journals and open access among medical oncologists: Results of an online survey. ESMO Open, 4(6) e000580: 8 pp. <https://doi.org/10.1136/ esmoopen-2019-000580>.
Sahni, V. (2023). Identifying predatory journals. British Dental Journal, 235(7): 449–449. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023- 6396-2>.
Shaw, D. (2025). The digital erosion of intellectual integrity: Why misuse of generative AI is worse than plagiarism. AI & Society, 40: 5819–5821. <https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00146-025-02362-2>.
Shen, C. & Shah, L. (2023). Predatory publishing practices: What researchers should know before submitting their manuscript. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 36: 7 pp. <https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.631>.
Siebert, M., Bourgeois, F. T. & Naudet, F. (2025). ICMJE should create a certification system to identify predatory journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 334(1): 87. <https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2025.3661>.
Singh Chawla, D. (2021). Hundreds of ‘predatory’ journals indexed on leading scholarly database. Nature, d41586-021-00239–0. <https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021- 00239-0>.
Sousa, F. S.D.O., Nadanovsky, P., Dhyppolito, I.M. & Santos, A.P.P.D. (2021). One year of unsolicited e-mails: The modus operandi of predatory journals and publishers. Journal of Dentistry, 109(103618) 6 pp. .
Springer Nature. (2023). Transformative journals | Open science. London: Springer Nature. [Consulted: 14.xi.2025]. .
Sureda-Negre, J., Calvo-Sastre, A. & Comas- Forgas, R. (2022). Predatory journals and publishers: Characteristics and impact of academic spam to researchers in educational sciences. Learned Publishing, 35(4): 441–447. <https://doi.org/10.1002/ leap.1450>.
Talari, K. & Ravindran, V. (2023). Predatory journals: How to recognise and keep clear! Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 53(4): 232–236. .
Teixeira Da Silva, J.A. (2025). Variation in 56 journal website characterization by an AI-driven “predatory” journal detector. Expert Systems with Applications, 283: 127933. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eswa.2025.127933>.
Teixeira Da Silva, J.A., Dunleavy, D.J., Moradzadeh, M. & Eykens, J. (2021). A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers. Scientometrics, 126(10): 8589–8616. <https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-021-04118-3>.
Teixeira Da Silva, J.A., Tsigaris, P. & Moussa, S. (2025). Are most FT50 journals truly “suspected predatory”, or has an AI-driven “predatory” journal detector erred in its classification? Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 37(2): 1–12. < h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 8 0 / 1 9 4 11 2 6x.2025.2497727>.
Thelwall, M. & Yaghi, A. (2024). In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results (Version 1). arXiv, 2409.16695: 27 pp. .
Tomlinson, O.W. (2024). Predatory publishing in medical education: A rapid scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1)33: 9 pp. <https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909- 024-05024-x>.
Ungerfeld, R. (2024). Publish or perish: The trap of predatory and illegitimate journals. Agrociencia Uruguay, 28(e1612): 6 pp. <https://doi.org/10.31285/ agro.28.1612>.
Vadhera, A.S., Lee, J.S., Veloso, I.L., Khan, Z.A., Trasolini, N.A., Gursoy, S., Kunze, K.N., Chahla, J. & Verma, N.N. (2022). Open access articles garner increased social media attention and citation rates compared with subscription access research articles: An altmetrics-based analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(13): 3690–3697. .
Van Noorden, R. (2024). Journals with high rates of suspicious papers flagged by science-integrity start-up. Nature, 634(8036): 1023–1025. <https://doi.org/10.1038/ d41586-024-03427-w>.
Walters, W.H. (2023). Are the works that cite Beall’s List accounting journals comparable to those that cite Scopus journals of similar citation impact? Aslib Journal of Information Management, 75(5): 844–862. <https://doi.org/10.1108/ AJIM-01-2022-0056>.
Wang, J.Z., Pourang, A. & Burrall, B. (2019). Open access medical journals: Benefits and challenges. Clinics in Dermatology, 37(1): 52–55. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j. clindermatol.2018.09.010>.
Yamada, Y. & Teixeira Da Silva, J.A. (2023). A measure to quantify predatory publishing is urgently needed. Accountability in Research, 32(1): 79–81. <https://doi.org/1 0.1080/08989621.2023.2186225>.
Ye, R., Pang, X., Chai, J., Chen, J., Yin, Z., Xiang, Z., Dong, X., Shao, J. & Chen, S. (2024). Are we there yet? Revealing the risks of utilizing large language models in scholarly peer review (Version 1). arXiv, 2412.01708: 27 pp. .
Yeo-Teh, N.S.L. & Tang, B.L. (2021). Wilfully submitting to and publishing in predatory journals—A covert form of research misconduct? Biochemia Medica, 31(3): 395–402. <https://doi.org/10.11613/ BM.2021.030201>.
Zheng, Z. (2025). The future of reviews writing in the AI era. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 9(8): 495–496. <https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41570-025-00738-y>.
Todo el contenido de esta revista está bajo una 