La La dimensión bioética en la medicina familiar: Hacia una atención integral y humanizada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66476/mf.v2n1.5483Palabras clave:
bioética, medicina familiar, principios éticos, autonomía del paciente, profesionalismo médico, toma de decisiones éticas, ParaguayResumen
Este artículo de perspectiva analiza el papel fundamental e insustituible de la bioética en la práctica contemporánea de la medicina familiar. Se argumenta que los principios bioéticos —autonomía, beneficencia, no maleficencia y justicia— no constituyen meros constructos teóricos, sino que representan herramientas prácticas esenciales que deben guiar la toma de decisiones clínicas, fomentar el profesionalismo y enriquecer la relación médico-paciente. Se sostiene la tesis de que una integración sistemática y reflexiva de la bioética, tanto en la formación de los médicos de familia como en su quehacer diario, es crucial para proveer una atención sanitaria compasiva, equitativa, de alta calidad y éticamente sólida.
Descargas
Referencias
Laws T, Chilton J. Ethics, cultural competence, and the changing face of america. Pastor Psychol. 2012;62(2):175-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-012-0428-1
Glynou A, Frysira E, Christakakou-Fotiadi K, Eleftheriadis M, Sarella A, Stergiotou I, et al. The cognitive approach to bioethical issues in perinatal care in greece. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e22760. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22760
Dale S. A critique of principlism. Voices Bioeth. 2023;9:1-9. https://doi.org/10.52214/vib.v9i.10522
Watine J. Why would medical publishers not incorporate core bioethical values into their ethics guidelines? Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;24(1):7-11. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2014.002
Turgut D, Yakar Z. Socioscientific issues and pre-service science teachers’ bioethical values. Probl Educ 21st Century. 2021;79(4):640-56. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.640
Wangmo T, Hauri S, Gennet É, Anane-Sarpong E, Provoost V, Elger B. An update on the “empirical turn” in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0246-9
Goldim J, Gibbon S. Between personal and relational privacy: understanding the work of informed consent in cancer genetics in brazil. J Community Genet. 2015;6(3):287-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-015-0234-4
Goodwin M. Vulnerable subjects: why does informed consent matter? J Law Med Ethics. 2016;44(3):371-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110516667935
Farrell R, Metcalfe J, McGowan M, Weise K, Agatisa P, Berg J. Emerging ethical issues in reproductive medicine: are bioethics educators ready? Hastings Cent Rep. 2014;44(5):21-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.354
Adinma J. Ethics in perinatal medicine. Niger J Paediatr. 2016;43(3):221. https://doi.org/10.4314/njp.v43i3.12
Orona C, Koenig B, Davis A. Cultural aspects of nondisclosure. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994;3(3):338-46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180100005156
Browning D. Sturdy for common things: cultivating moral sensemaking on the front lines of practice. J Med Ethics. 2011;38(4):233-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100084
Parker M. Overstating values: medical facts, diverse values, bioethics and values-based medicine. Bioethics. 2011;27(2):97-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01902.x
Emmerich N. A sociological analysis of ethical expertise. Sage Open. 2015;5(2):215824401559044. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015590445
Have H. Global bioethics: transnational experiences and islamic bioethics. Zygon. 2013;48(3):591-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12035
Dib C. Bioethics-csr divide. Voices Bioeth. 2024;10:1-6. https://doi.org/10.52214/vib.v10i.12376
Czarny M, Faden R, Nolan M, Bodensiek E, Sugarman J. Response to open peer commentaries on “medical and nursing students’ television viewing habits: potential implications for bioethics”. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8(12):W1. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160802595074
Kuczewski M, Bading E, Langbein M, Henry B. Fostering professionalism: the loyola model. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2003;12(2):161-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180103122050
Kirkov V, Vodenicharova A, Markova K, Borisova L, Popova K. Bioethics in the education of the future healthcare professionals. Pharmacia. 2024;71:1-5. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e121139.figure2
Okwenna C. An african response to the philosophical crises in medicine: towards an african philosophy of medicine and bioethics. Filos Theor J Afr Philos Cult Relig. 2021;10(2):1-20. https://doi.org/10.4314/ft.v10i2.1
Landry J, Valiani S, Foreman T, Patel R. Development of an ethics education curriculum for critical care trainees in canada: from knowledge synthesis to bedside application. Int J Ethics Educ. 2015;1(1):57-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-015-0006-3
Tavares A, Travassos A, Rêgo F, Nunes R. Bioethics curriculum in medical schools in portuguese-speaking countries. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03250-9
Hoffmaster B, Hooker C. What reason can do for clinical moral perception. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(10):29-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160903013845
Wiwanitkit S, Wiwanitkit V. Chatgpt’s relevance for bioethics: comment. Formos J Surg. 2024;57(5):214. https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000150
Mueller R. Prognostic imagination: genetic counseling amidst therapeutic innovation and evolving futures. J Genet Couns. 2022;32(4):762-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1660
Dive L, Newson A. Reconceptualizing autonomy for bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2018;28(2):171-203. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2018.0013
Samuel J, Burgart A, Wootton S, Magnus D, Lantos J, Tyson J. Randomized n-of-1 trials: quality improvement, research, or both? Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20161103. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1103
Have H. Bioethics education in a global perspective. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. DOI no disponible.
Shaw J, Donia J. The sociotechnical ethics of digital health: a critique and extension of approaches from bioethics. Front Digit Health. 2021;3:725088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.725088
Shirazi B, Riaz Q, Jafarey A, Ahmed R, Shamim M. The current status and challenges of bioethics education in undergraduate medical education in karachi, pakistan. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2023 Aug 29 [citado 2024 Ene 10]:rs.3.rs-3315723. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3315723/v1
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Alcides Chaux
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los artículos se distribuyen bajo licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional — CC BY 4.0. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y otorgan a la revista el derecho de primera publicación. Cualquier reutilización debe reconocer la autoría, citar la fuente original e indicar si se realizaron modificaciones.
